File 45.
Dated : 31st May, 2012.
Jai Sri Ram.
VisvAmitra reveals MahAtma Rama.
Rama is VishNu's incarnation. Though in
human form He is a Mahatma and a Satya parakrama:
Veda Aham etam
purusham mahantam - These words of the Upanishads are reproduced by
Valmiki through Visvamitra.
Dasaratha's thinking was that Rama, His son and about 12
years old, is better known by Him than by Visvamitra, who had just then arrived
to ask for His help. In that context Visvamitra emphasizes to say
Aham vedmi Mahatmanam, Ramam
satyaparakramam meaning He alone knows the way Rama to be known and
not really Dasaratha.
Swami Periya Vachan Pillai explains Sage Visvamitra's
dig at Dasaratha in the following many ways :
Rama is perceivable by jnana as instrument of sight and not by the external eyes. So doth
Visvamitra, a Jnani and not Dasaratha,
an a-Jnani
He is accessible to those who bend and bow and not to those
who are the recipients of such salutations. So, Visvamitra knows and not Dasaratha.
He is touched by those in karmanushtanam symbolized by the wearing of dharbai
(pul-crafted grass ring) and not
to those wielding a bow (vill). The former symbolize kainkaraya bhavam. The later ahankara sambhavitam. So, Visvamitra
knows and not Dasaratha.
He is approachable by satvic
qualities and not by rajasa or
tamasa dispositions. Visvamitra by penance and control of
senses is a Satvic. Dasaratha
being a King have to be rajasic if not tamasic to quell His
enemies. So, Visvamitra knows and
not Dasaratha.
He occupies a pedestal position before an arti, garbing naichya
bhavam. The King occupies the thrown before His subjects, displaying prabhutvam.
So, Visvamitra knows and not Dasaratha.
He is attainable by Yoga,
control on senses and distanced
by bhoga, indulgence in sensual
pleasures. So, Visvamitra
knows and not Dasaratha.
He yields to Brahma kama
and distanced by loukika kama. So, Visvamitra knows and not Dasaratha.
He grants moksha
to the dharma charis. Grants arta-kama to the opposite.
So, Visvamitra knows and
not Dasaratha.
All the universe His child, so thinks Visvamitra. Rama His child, so thinks
Dasaratha.
So, Visvamitra knows
and not Dasaratha.
Visvamitra had
known the Brahman, as not comprehendible. So He the knower. Dasaratha mistakes
the un-comprehendible as comprehendible, in the form of His Son. So He knoweth not.
kO itha veda ? Vedas fail in themselves. And the Brahman too
of Himself. Iyatha rahitvam means
one cannot limit Brahman to 'He is this' "He is this" like. He is
above all these would be right way to comprehend.
Mahatma means no end to His fame nor any body greater
than Him, Paratvam. Rama means He is all that simple and
easily accessible, soulabyam.
The one who do not
possess this knowledge is the ignorant and the other the true knower.
No comments:
Post a Comment